##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Pinondang Hutapea
Melda Panjaitan

Abstract

The objectives of this study are: (1) To determine the differences in generic skills due to the effects of the GI type cooperative learning model and the DI model in class XI of SMA Negeri 3 Medan (2). To determine the differences in generic skills of students who have high laboratory skills and low generic skills in class XI of SMA Negeri 3 Medan (3) To determine whether there is an interaction between the GI type cooperative learning model and the DI learning model with laboratory skills on students' generic skills. The sampling technique used a purposive sample consisting of two classes with a total sample of 72 students. The research instrument was a learning achievement test and a questionnaire on students' generic skills. The test used to obtain data was in the form of multiple choices. The data in the study were analyzed using SPSS 28 with two-way ANOVA. The results of the ANOVA test obtained: 1. The generic skills of learning physics of students taught with the GI type cooperative learning model are higher than the physics learning achievement of students taught with the DI learning model. 2. The physics learning achievement of students who have high generic skills is higher than the physics learning achievement of students who have low generic skills. 3. There is an interaction between the GI type cooperative learning model and laboratory skills on students' generic skills.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Andreas, S (2021). Menguasai Pembuatan Animasi dengan Flash MX. Jakarta, PT Elek Multimedia Komputindo
Arikunto, S. (2020). Dasar – dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan ( Edisi Revisi). Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
Arsyad, A. (2021). Media Pembelajaran.Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.
Franscus, A.dan Ibrahim L. Tunde. 2020. Effect Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions Strategi and Mathematics Knowledge In Learning Outcomes in Chemical Kinetics. The Journal Of Internasional Sosial Research Volume 2 / 6 Winner.
Gayne. (2021). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif.Media Persada. Medan
Hartono, (2021). Pembelajaran Kooperatif (C00verative Learning) Dalam Pengajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Universitas Islam An Nur Lampung, journal an-nur.ac.id
Lois Oinike Tambunan, (2021). Implementasi Pembelajaran Cooperative Learning dan Locus of Control dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, 5 (2). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika j-cup.org/index.php/cendekia/article/view/491/321
Makmum (2021).Belajar dan Pembelajaran.Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Mutia Anjani, Ruli Sugiawardana & Mohamad Rezha. (2022). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction dengan Personalized System For Instruction Terhadap Jumlah Waktu Aktif Belajar Pendidikan Jasmani. 8 (2). jurnal.unigal.ac.id/JKP/article/view/9631/0
Putri Suci El Mahanani, (2022). Penerapan Metode Cooperative Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Kelas 3 SDN Tambakrejo Gurah Kediri. 2 (2), Jurnal Cipta Media Harmoni. ac.id
Selpia Anggraini Susino, Destiniar. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas X SMA, Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika,8 (1), 53-61,j-cup.org/index.php/cendekia.
Slavin. (2020). Learning to Teach. Edisi ketujuh, Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Sunyoto, D. (2020). Aplikasi SPSS Untuk Statistik Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Yogyakarta : CAPS
Surya, Y. 2020. Olimpiade Fisika. Jakarta: PT. Primatika Cipta Ilmu.
Sry, K. (2021). Pemanfaatan Microsoft Power Point untuk Media Pembelajaran, (Online), http://pamongsakaba, wordpress.com/2009/09/29/pemanfaatan-microsoft-power-point-untuk-media-pembelajaran/diakses 2 Juni 2010).
Tabrani, Muhammad amin. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Learning, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konselimg, 5 (2), https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jpdk/article/view/12581/9665
Tri hendradi, C. (2021). Step by Step SPSS 25 Analisis Data Statistik. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi